Skip to main content

Industry report · Data as of 1. June 2026

Media & Publishing

100% of AI mentions of Nomos come from ChatGPT; other models barely name the brand.

Nomos is the most cited brand by AI assistants, though it does not appear in the top 10 results of classic web search. A distinct divergence exists between the two retrieval systems, as three of the top four AI-recommended brands are entirely absent from the leading web results, whereas the top web search brand, Krautreporter, ranks fifth in AI visibility. Additionally, investigative publisher CORRECTIV shows a strong sentiment skew, receiving mostly positive AI mentions in contrast to the strictly neutral coverage of the leading brand.

15 Queries Sample: 150 AI models: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity

The 10 most visible brands in AI answers

Ranked by AI prominence, a consolidated 0–100 visibility score: how often a brand is named, across how many AI models, at what position, and in what sentiment. Two further factors (recommendation strength, momentum) cannot be measured here and remain hidden.

  1. OBS Studio

    obsproject.com ↑3 70.8 Big Name

    Obsproject is cited in 7% of queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, showing high AI visibility while not appearing in the top 10 for classic web search. The sharpest data point is this complete AI-only presence, which pairs with a high average AI answer position of 1.2 and exclusively positive sentiment.

  2. Buzzsprout

    buzzsprout.com ↑3 70.4 Big Name

    Buzzsprout appears in 7% of queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, demonstrating consistent AI visibility despite not ranking in the top 10 for classic web search. The brand's standout metric is this absolute AI-versus-search gap, combined with a flawless 100% run consistency and nine strictly positive mentions.

  3. Torial

    torial.com ↑6 69.7 Big Name

    Torial achieves a 7% query coverage across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity while also maintaining a visible presence in classic web search with an average rank of 6.0. Its defining characteristic is a consistently positive AI sentiment profile, recording nine positive mentions with zero neutral or negative evaluations.

  4. Streamlabs

    streamlabs.com ↑3 69.0 Big Name

    Streamlabs is cited in 7% of queries by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, showing a balanced visibility profile with an average classic web search rank of 7.0. The product's most notable metric is its 100% run consistency paired with an exclusively positive sentiment across all nine of its AI mentions.

  5. Der Spiegel

    spiegel.de New 68.0 Big Name

    DER SPIEGEL shows high visibility in both environments by appearing in 7% of queries across all three AI platforms with an average AI position of 1.0 and a classic web search rank of 2.0. Unlike the other measured brands, its sentiment profile is mixed, showing four positive and three neutral mentions alongside a lower run consistency of 78%.

# Brand Prominence Tier
6 New Transistor
transistor.fm
67.1 Big Name
7 New Captivate
captivate.fm
65.1 Big Name
8 New Content calendar tool Kordiam
kordiam.io
64.8 Big Name
9 ↓3 Inxmail
inxmail.de
64.6 Big Name
10 New CORRECTIV
correctiv.org
64.1 Big Name

Your brand not in the top 10? The free scan shows whether ChatGPT and Gemini recommend it.

Start free scan

Same brands, different visibility

Brands present in both channels, normalized to the per-channel peak and sorted by asymmetry. A long AI bar next to a short web-search bar means the brand is named disproportionately often by AI models even though it barely appears in organic web-search results. The reverse holds too.

AI citations Classic web search
State of Digital Publishing
stateofdigitalpublishing.com
Krautreporter
krautreporter.de
Inxmail
inxmail.de
Torial
torial.com
Streamlabs
streamlabs.com
CORRECTIV
correctiv.org
WP RSS Aggregator
wprssaggregator.com
Der Spiegel
spiegel.de
FlipHTML5
fliphtml5.com
mail2many
mail2many.de

Normalized per channel to the peak · sorted by |Δ|

ChatGPT citations Classic web search
Inxmail
inxmail.de
Torial
torial.com
Streamlabs
streamlabs.com
Der Spiegel
spiegel.de
FlipHTML5
fliphtml5.com
mail2many
mail2many.de
Ignite
ignite.video
Fachzeitungen
fachzeitungen.de
Fidion
fidion.de
CORRECTIV
correctiv.org

Normalized per channel to the peak · sorted by |Δ|

Gemini citations Classic web search
CORRECTIV
correctiv.org
Inxmail
inxmail.de
Torial
torial.com
Streamlabs
streamlabs.com
Der Spiegel
spiegel.de
Freischreiber
freischreiber.de
United Kiosk
united-kiosk.de
Krautreporter
krautreporter.de
mail2many
mail2many.de
InterRed
interred.de

Normalized per channel to the peak · sorted by |Δ|

Perplexity citations Classic web search
Krautreporter
krautreporter.de
State of Digital Publishing
stateofdigitalpublishing.com
Inxmail
inxmail.de
Torial
torial.com
Streamlabs
streamlabs.com
FlipHTML5
fliphtml5.com
Freischreiber
freischreiber.de
InterRed
interred.de
MAILINGWORK
mailingwork.de
Taz
taz.de

Normalized per channel to the peak · sorted by |Δ|

AI top 10 vs. web-search top 10

On the left, the brands named most often in AI answers; on the right, the brands most visible in classic web-search results. Pink lines connect brands that appear in both top-10 lists.

10 AI only 0 in both 10 web search only

AI top 10 · Top 5
Web-search top 10 · Top 5

stabil Marken, die in mindestens zwei von drei Modell-Durchläufen je Anfrage auftauchen.

Check your own brand

How visible is your brand?

See, for free, whether ChatGPT and Gemini recommend your brand in Media & Publishing.

Scan brand for free Get in Touch

Complete brand ranking, AI citations per model, and methodology. Direct download, no email required.

Download PDF

Methodology

Achtung.app sends typical German-language queries for each industry to classic web search and to the active AI models. Queries are brand-free, so results show which brands surface organically. Both channels receive identical prompts so answers can be compared directly. Every brand named in the responses is extracted and consolidated on its canonical domain. The classic-web-search source is Brave Search, a Google-independent organic index.

3 runs per AI model per query; classic web search via a single top-10 fetch. Models queried: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity. Platforms and infrastructure (e.g. Google Analytics, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok) are excluded from the brand list because they are marketing channels, not competitors.

Frequently asked questions about this report

How is the AI prominence score calculated?

AI prominence is a 0–100 score built from four measured factors: in how many queries the brand is named (coverage), how many of the evaluated AI platforms cite it (breadth), where it appears in the answers (position), and how the mentions read (sentiment). Only measured values go in — no estimates.

Which AI platforms does the report evaluate?

This report is based on answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity. Each query was asked multiple times per platform; the details are in the methodology note above.

How current is the data?

The numbers come from the collection run of 1. June 2026. Achtung.app re-collects this report monthly; the ranking and texts are fully recomputed each time.

Does ranking first mean the brand is the best?

No. The ranking measures how visible a brand is in AI answers, not the quality of its products or services. A high AI prominence means AI assistants name the brand frequently and prominently when users ask questions in this field.

Why is a specific brand missing?

The report only lists brands that appeared in the AI answers or in the classic web search top 10 for the tested queries. If a brand is missing, it was not named for this query set; that says nothing about other topic areas. Pure platform and infrastructure domains are deliberately excluded.

Can I reuse the data?

Yes. The published figures and rankings are licensed under CC BY 4.0: you may share and reuse them as long as you credit Achtung.app as the source and link to this page.

Who shows up in which industry in AI answers — Achtung.app measures it.

All industry reports →