Skip to main content

Transparency

Achtung.app tracks itself

Achtung.app measures how visible brands are in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. The same measurement runs for Achtung.app itself, and the results are public: the complete series from the very first week, including the weeks with few or no mentions. It makes visible how a young brand begins to appear in AI answers and how its presence changes over time.

20

Search queries tracked daily

10,725

AI answers analysed

27

Mentions in the answer text

30

Source references

May 2026

Tracked since

The models are never told the name Achtung.app. Only unaided hits in answers to neutral search queries are counted.

Visibility rate of Achtung.app per week

ChatGPT 2.50 Gemini 0.00 Perplexity 0.00 Source references (all providers) 0.00
0 2 4 % W25 W28 W31 W34 W38 (ongoing)

Share of analysed answers in which ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity mention Achtung.app in the answer text, per calendar week. Pure source references do not count in the provider lines; the grey dashed line shows their rate across all three providers. The absolute numbers sit on every data point.

Visibility rate of Achtung.app per week
Week ChatGPT Gemini Perplexity Source references (all providers)
W25 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W26 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W27 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W28 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W29 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W30 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W31 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W32 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.61 %
W33 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %
W34 1.42 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 1.01 %
W35 2.50 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.50 %
W36 1.77 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 1.03 %
W37 3.18 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.63 %
W38 (ongoing) 2.50 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 %

Week 38 is still running: 215 answers analysed, 2 of them with a mention in the answer text, 0 with a source reference. Visibility rate 0.93 %.

Across the whole series that comes to 39 different search queries rather than 20, because the tracked questions changed along the way. On August 5, 2026 Achtung.app swapped the tracked questions. They come mostly from Google Search Console, meaning queries Google had already shown the site for at some point, not a neutral cross-section of what people search for. That tilts the sample toward Achtung.app, because what surfaces in Google is easier for search-grounded models to reach. The head start is small, though: Achtung.app appeared at all for 15 of the 20 questions, on average at position 44.

The questions themselves are set by hand. The automatic selection that favours questions with previous hits is switched off for them. The swap does not explain the later hits. Across the 20 questions that ran unchanged throughout, the rate went from 0 in 6,005 answers to 10 in 351. These are small numbers too; it takes several weeks before they say anything.

As of September 15, 2026

Latest hits

The latest hits from the measurement data: the search query, the provider, and where Achtung.app appears.

  1. ChatGPT Mention

    Search query: “markenreputation in ki überwachen”

    “Achtung.app: Dieses Tool misst die KI-Sichtbarkeit von Marken und bietet ein Dashboard mit KI-Prominenz-Trends, Wettbewerbsvergleichen und KI-Traffic-Analysen aus KI-Assistenten. (achtung.app)”
  2. ChatGPT Recommendation

    Search query: “wie nutze ich ki-monitoring-daten in meiner agentur für kundenpräsentationen?”

    “Achtung.app: Dieses Tool ermöglicht es Agenturen, die KI-Sichtbarkeit ihrer Kundenmarken in Echtzeit zu überwachen. Es bietet ein zentrales Dashboard, in dem Sie die Nennungen Ihrer Kunden in KI-Antworten verfolgen und mit Wettbewerbern ve…”
  3. Perplexity Source reference

    Search query: “ki visibility”

    Achtung.app appears here only among the answer's cited sources, not in the answer text.

  4. ChatGPT Recommendation

    Search query: “wie nutze ich ki-monitoring-daten in meiner agentur für kundenpräsentationen?”

    “Ein Beispiel hierfür ist Achtung.app, das für Agenturen entwickelt wurde und es ermöglicht, die Sichtbarkeit von Marken in verschiedenen KI-Plattformen zu überwachen. Es bietet ein zentrales Dashboard, in dem Sie die Nennungen Ihrer Kunden…”
  5. Perplexity Source reference

    Search query: “ki sichtbarkeitscheck”

    Achtung.app appears here only among the answer's cited sources, not in the answer text.

Milestones

Derived automatically from the measurement data: the first mention, the first recommendation and the first source reference per provider.

  1. First source reference in Perplexity
  2. First mention in ChatGPT
  3. First recommendation in ChatGPT

Individual hits can disappear again; AI answers fluctuate from day to day. That is why the weekly trend counts, not the single hit.

How Achtung.app measures

  • The panel is built the same way as for every customer brand: Achtung.app suggests suitable queries, simulating how AI providers fan a user question out into many variations. Which of them get tracked is ultimately the brand owner's call.
  • Measurement runs daily with standardised query parameters against ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity: a prioritised core of the panel is queried every day, further queries rotate in.
  • Three signals are counted separately: a mention only exists when Achtung.app appears in the answer text; a recommendation when the text actually recommends Achtung.app. When Achtung.app appears only among an answer's cited sources, that counts separately as a source reference, not as a mention.
  • Claude runs weekly with a much smaller sample. That is not enough for a fair week-over-week comparison, which is why Claude is missing from the chart.
  • The numbers on this page come straight from the measurement database and refresh several times a day.

How the measurement works in detail is documented in the methodology.

How visible is your brand in AI answers?

The free scan shows you within minutes whether ChatGPT and Gemini mention your brand.

Check your brand now