Brand profile
CHECK24
How often AI names CHECK24 and where the brand ranks in web search. Aggregated across 7 Achtung.app industry reports.
check24.de DACH dataset (DE/AT/CH), as of 1. Oct 2026
CHECK24 was named in 75 analysed AI answers across 7 industry reports. Its strongest placement is the Hospitality & Travel report: rank 2 of 243 by AI prominence. Perplexity names the brand most often, on average at position 3,5 of the answer. In classic web search CHECK24 holds 22 results, at an average rank of 6,6.
At a glance
Verticals CHECK24 appears in
Sorted by rank. Click to open the full vertical report.
| Vertical | Rank | AI citations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitality & Travel | #2/243 | 34 | View report |
| Insurance | #2/148 | 31 | View report |
| Finance & Fintech | #54/261 | 3 | View report |
| E-commerce & Retail | #123/474 | 4 | View report |
| Automotive & Mobility | #225/296 | 3 | View report |
| Health & Wellness | #389/428 | 0 | View report |
| WM 2026 Sponsoren-Check | #468/489 | 0 | View report |
AI prominence over time
How the AI prominence of CHECK24 has moved across the collections so far. One point per report collection.
CHECK24 in Hospitality & Travel
| Collection | CHECK24 | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 26 | 72.5 | 68.4 |
| Oct 26 | 74.6 | 66.1 |
CHECK24 in Insurance
| Collection | CHECK24 | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 26 | 67.5 | 65.3 |
| Sep 26 | 75.9 | 65.6 |
CHECK24 in Finance & Fintech
| Collection | CHECK24 | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 26 | 50.5 | 64.8 |
| Jun 26 | 0.0 | 68.3 |
| Jul 26 | 48.5 | 65.6 |
| Oct 26 | 45.6 | 66.5 |
AI prominence is a 0 to 100 score combining citation frequency, position and model coverage. The dashed line is the average of the ten strongest brands in the same collection, which shows whether a movement came from the brand or from the whole market. The series only covers verticals with at least two collections. Definitions in the glossary.
Competitive context
The brands placed directly above and below CHECK24 in the Hospitality & Travel report, by AI prominence.
From the industry reports
CHECK24 is cited in 53% of queries across all four AI platforms, showing comparable average positioning in AI outputs (4.3) and classic web search (5.5). The brand exhibits a notably positive sentiment profile, with positive AI mentions outnumbering neutral ones.
CHECK24 is cited in 53 percent of queries across Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and ChatGPT, securing leading average positions in both AI outputs (2.2) and classic web search (3.2). The marketplace exhibits an overwhelmingly neutral sentiment profile, receiving 28 neutral citations and only 3 positive ones.
Which AI models name CHECK24?
Distribution of citations across the AI models we query. Longer bars mean the model named CHECK24 more often in its answers.
n = 75 citations total
-
Perplexity26 (35%)
-
Gemini21 (28%)
-
Claude17 (23%)
-
ChatGPT11 (15%)
Sentiment of citations
When AI answers mention CHECK24, in what tone do they do it?
n = 75 rated citations
- positive: 22
- neutral: 53
Tones too infrequent to be a reliable signal are not shown.
Sample queries where CHECK24 was named
A cross-section of the automated queries where AI models included CHECK24 in their answer.
| Query | Model |
|---|---|
| Berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung für IT Freiberufler Testsieger | Gemini |
| Zinsgünstiger Modernisierungskredit für Immobilieneigentümer | Perplexity |
| Preisvergleichsportal Anbindung | Claude |
| günstige flüge vergleichen | Claude |
| hotel buchen günstig | Claude |
| hotel buchen mit flug | ChatGPT |
| hotel buchungsportale vergleich | ChatGPT |
| pauschalreise anbieter vergleich | ChatGPT |
Discoverability for AI platforms
Weekly audit of the technical prerequisites that search-grounded AI platforms (live web search per query) need to find and render this site.
Last checked: 2. Sep 2026
Two crawler categories: AI live-retrieval crawlers fetch pages on demand to answer questions in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude; training crawlers feed model pre-training. Only the live-retrieval layer is graded here; the training tier is an editorial choice.
Critical: blocks AI visibility
- AI live-retrieval crawlers allowed in robots.txt
- No silent edge block on AI live-retrieval crawlers
- HTTPS reachable on the homepage
- Sitemap reachable
- Homepage renders content without JavaScript
Important: improves capture
- Canonical URL declared
- Open Graph title and image set
- HSTS header advertised
- No SPA, or a SPA with a meaningful noscript fallback
Agent readiness: makes facts machine-readable
This check does not count towards AI visibility. It answers a different question: could software verify a fact about this brand without reading prose? On current evidence, structured markup does not make a brand cited more often in AI answers.
- Organization or WebSite JSON-LD on the homepage
Training-crawler status (informational, not graded): 0 / 5 blockiert.
Diagnostics
- JSON-LD types
-
No JSON-LD on the homepage
SEO hygiene; per Google not a direct lever for AI citations.
- Sitemap
- 8 URLs
- llms.txt (informational)
-
absent
Per Google, no effect on AI visibility; tracked here for information only.
- Encryption
- HTTPS ✓ · HSTS —
Track your own brand over time?
Achtung.app monitors how often a brand is named in AI answers and classic web search, which verticals it appears in, and how that changes over time.
All figures come from Achtung.app's published vertical reports. Achtung.app runs standardized, brand-free queries against AI models and classic web search, extracts named brands, and consolidates them on their canonical domain. Details in the methodology document.