Brand profile
Sendinblue
How often AI names Sendinblue and where the brand ranks in web search. Aggregated across 4 Achtung.app industry reports.
sendinblue.com DACH dataset (DE/AT/CH), as of 1. Aug 2026
Sendinblue was named in 22 analysed AI answers across 4 industry reports. Its strongest placement is the Marketing & Advertising report: rank 82 of 642 by AI prominence. ChatGPT names the brand most often, on average at position 4,0 of the answer. The same queries returned no classic web-search result for the brand.
At a glance
Verticals Sendinblue appears in
Sorted by rank. Click to open the full vertical report.
| Vertical | Rank | AI citations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing & Advertising | #82/642 | 4 | View report |
| SaaS & Software | #109/324 | 10 | View report |
| Media & Publishing | #251/422 | 1 | From an earlier capture |
| E-commerce & Retail | #272/512 | 7 | View report |
AI prominence over time
How the AI prominence of Sendinblue has moved across the collections so far. One point per report collection.
Sendinblue in Marketing & Advertising
| Collection | Sendinblue | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| May 26 | 55.2 | 62.8 |
| Jun 26 | 19.2 | 59.2 |
| Jul 26 | 44.2 | 60.2 |
| Aug 26 | 42.4 | 60.5 |
Sendinblue in SaaS & Software
| Collection | Sendinblue | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 26 | 49.9 | 71.1 |
| Jun 26 | 53.8 | 71.5 |
| Jul 26 | 48.1 | 71.1 |
| Aug 26 | 42.9 | 70.3 |
Sendinblue in Media & Publishing
| Collection | Sendinblue | Top 10 in the report |
|---|---|---|
| May 26 | 44.2 | 66.7 |
| Jun 26 | 30.0 | 67.4 |
AI prominence is a 0 to 100 score combining citation frequency, position and model coverage. The dashed line is the average of the ten strongest brands in the same collection, which shows whether a movement came from the brand or from the whole market. The series only covers verticals with at least two collections. Definitions in the glossary.
Competitive context
The brands placed directly above and below Sendinblue in the Marketing & Advertising report, by AI prominence.
| Rank | Brand | AI prominence |
|---|---|---|
| #80 | Finnpartners | 42,8 |
| #81 | Oseon | 42,6 |
| #82 | Sendinblue | 42,4 |
| #83 | kowerk | 42,3 |
| #84 | SK ONE | 42,1 |
Which AI models name Sendinblue?
Distribution of citations across the AI models we query. Longer bars mean the model named Sendinblue more often in its answers.
n = 22 citations total
-
ChatGPT10 (45%)
-
Gemini10 (45%)
-
Perplexity2 (9%)
Sentiment of citations
When AI answers mention Sendinblue, in what tone do they do it?
n = 22 rated citations
- positive: 5
- neutral: 17
Tones too infrequent to be a reliable signal are not shown.
Sample queries where Sendinblue was named
A cross-section of the automated queries where AI models included Sendinblue in their answer.
| Query | Model |
|---|---|
| bestes CRM für kleine Unternehmen | ChatGPT |
| welche E-Mail-Marketing-Software empfehlen | ChatGPT |
| E-Mail Marketing Dienstleister | ChatGPT |
| E-Mail-Newsletter-Dienst für Verlage | Gemini |
| E-Mail Marketing Tools E-Commerce | ChatGPT |
Discoverability for AI platforms
Weekly audit of the technical prerequisites that search-grounded AI platforms (live web search per query) need to find and render this site.
Last checked: 2. Aug 2026
Two crawler categories: AI live-retrieval crawlers fetch pages on demand to answer questions in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude; training crawlers feed model pre-training. Only the live-retrieval layer is graded here; the training tier is an editorial choice.
Critical: blocks AI visibility
- AI live-retrieval crawlers allowed in robots.txt
- No silent edge block on AI live-retrieval crawlers
- HTTPS reachable on the homepage
- Sitemap reachable
- Homepage renders content without JavaScript
Important: improves capture
- Canonical URL declared
- Open Graph title and image set
- HSTS header advertised
- No SPA, or a SPA with a meaningful noscript fallback
Agent readiness: makes facts machine-readable
This check does not count towards AI visibility. It answers a different question: could software verify a fact about this brand without reading prose? On current evidence, structured markup does not make a brand cited more often in AI answers.
- Organization or WebSite JSON-LD on the homepage
Training-crawler status (informational, not graded): 0 / 5 blockiert.
Diagnostics
- JSON-LD types
-
No JSON-LD on the homepage
SEO hygiene; per Google not a direct lever for AI citations.
- Sitemap
- 5.350 URLs
- llms.txt (informational)
-
absent
Per Google, no effect on AI visibility; tracked here for information only.
- Encryption
- HTTPS ✓ · HSTS —
- SPA
- Detected client framework: react
Track your own brand over time?
Achtung.app monitors how often a brand is named in AI answers and classic web search, which verticals it appears in, and how that changes over time.
Check your brandAll figures come from Achtung.app's published vertical reports. Achtung.app runs standardized, brand-free queries against AI models and classic web search, extracts named brands, and consolidates them on their canonical domain. Details in the methodology document.