Brand profile
Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München
How often AI names Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München and where the brand ranks in web search. From one Achtung.app industry report.
efv-am.de DACH dataset (DE/AT/CH), as of 18. Jul 2026
Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München was named in 2 analysed AI answers in the Vermögensverwalter industry report. That places the brand 234 of 307 there by AI prominence. Every citation comes from Gemini, on average at position 9,5 of the answer. The same queries returned no classic web-search result for the brand.
At a glance
Verticals Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München appears in
Sorted by rank. Click to open the full vertical report.
| Vertical | Rank | AI citations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermögensverwalter | #234/307 | 2 | View report |
Competitive context
The brands placed directly above and below Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München in the Vermögensverwalter report, by AI prominence.
| Rank | Brand | AI prominence |
|---|---|---|
| #232 | Allianz-Entwicklung-Klima | 21,9 |
| #233 | Julius Baer | 21,9 |
| #234 | Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München | 20,8 |
| #235 | GLOBAL Vermögenspartner GmbH | 20,3 |
| #236 | HSBC Private Bank | 19,6 |
Which AI models name Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München?
Distribution of citations across the AI models we query. Longer bars mean the model named Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München more often in its answers.
n = 2 citations total
-
Gemini2 (100%)
Sample queries where Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München was named
A cross-section of the automated queries where AI models included Erste Finanz- und Vermögensberater efv GmbH München in their answer.
| Query | Model |
|---|---|
| Welche Vermögensverwalter in München sind empfehlenswert? | Gemini |
Discoverability for AI platforms
Weekly audit of the technical prerequisites that search-grounded AI platforms (live web search per query) need to find and render this site.
Last checked: 2. Sep 2026
Two crawler categories: AI live-retrieval crawlers fetch pages on demand to answer questions in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude; training crawlers feed model pre-training. Only the live-retrieval layer is graded here; the training tier is an editorial choice.
Critical: blocks AI visibility
- AI live-retrieval crawlers allowed in robots.txt
- No silent edge block on AI live-retrieval crawlers
- HTTPS reachable on the homepage
- Sitemap reachable
- Homepage renders content without JavaScript
Important: improves capture
- Canonical URL declared
- Open Graph title and image set
- HSTS header advertised
- No SPA, or a SPA with a meaningful noscript fallback
Agent readiness: makes facts machine-readable
This check does not count towards AI visibility. It answers a different question: could software verify a fact about this brand without reading prose? On current evidence, structured markup does not make a brand cited more often in AI answers.
- Organization or WebSite JSON-LD on the homepage
Diagnostics
- JSON-LD types
-
No JSON-LD on the homepage
SEO hygiene; per Google not a direct lever for AI citations.
- Sitemap
- No sitemap reachable
- llms.txt (informational)
-
absent
Per Google, no effect on AI visibility; tracked here for information only.
- Encryption
- HTTPS ✓ · HSTS —
Track your own brand over time?
Achtung.app monitors how often a brand is named in AI answers and classic web search, which verticals it appears in, and how that changes over time.
Check your brandAll figures come from Achtung.app's published vertical reports. Achtung.app runs standardized, brand-free queries against AI models and classic web search, extracts named brands, and consolidates them on their canonical domain. Details in the methodology document.